SlagleRock's Slaughterhouse
Don't be a fool and die for your country. Let the other sonofabitch die for his.
-- General George S. Patton

October 16, 2004

America's Most Highly Decorated Living Veteran Calls Kerry 'a Man of Benedict Arnold Qualities'

benedict_kerry.jpg

I found this one on Human Events Online, but have decided to run it in its entirety here.
Thanks go out to Aaron of Aaron's Rantblog for the picture (tip:its a link to his site)

George E. "Bud" Day, Col, USAF is America's most highly decorated living veteran officer. He served in World War II, Korea and Vietnam, receiving more than 50 combat awards and the Congressional Medal of Honor.

What he wants now is to stop John Kerry from being elected President.

Day traveled from his home in Florida to Washington, D.C., last week to participate in the filming of two new ads by Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. In one of the spots, he directly addresses Kerry: "How can you expect our sons and daughters to follow you, when you condemned their fathers and grandfathers?"

In the early 1970s, when Kerry was meeting with America's Communist enemies in Paris and falsely claiming to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that U.S. forces in Vietnam were committing war crimes on a day-to-day basis, Day was a POW, languishing in a North Vietnamese prison.

During his five-plus years of captivity he was brutally tortured. Now he is one of several former POWs featured in Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal, a documentary about the effect of the anti-war movement on American POWs in Vietnam. The film, which portrays John Kerry in an unsympathetic light, will soon air in part on 62 broadcast stations owned by the Sinclair Broadcast Group, despite loud protests from the Kerry camp. Many of the company's stations are in swing states.

HUMAN EVENTS Assistant Editor David Freddoso interviewed Day October 13 on his decision to publicly oppose Kerry:

You are a winner of the Congressional Medal of Honor, and well known among people familiar with the history of Vietnam. What is so important to you about this election that you have decided to get involved in the efforts of the Swift Boat veterans?


COL. BUD DAY: I felt a terrible sense of outrage when the Kerry campaign attacked President Bush about his National Guard qualifications, because I was the advisor to a Guard unit that got called up for Vietnam, and we lost three friends of mine. And I thought it was a very mean thing for him to be discounting that military service in the Guard, because that unit likewise could have been called up. They were flying 102s out of Thailand during the Vietnam War. It wasn't probable, but it certainly was possible. I thought it was a very unfair thing. And then, when his campaign began playing Kerry up as a war hero, I thought that was very questionable, considering the fact that while his service might have been satisfactory, what he did in 1971 after coming back was quite unsatisfactory.

What was your first exposure to Kerry's 1971 testimony?

DAY: At the time I was a POW, but I didn't connect it up with him, because there were a lot of loonies out there protesting the war. I had just heard that a Naval officer was badmouthing our performance and basically saying we ought to get out of Vietnam and the war was wrong and so forth. I wasn't aware that it was him until well after I was back from Vietnam.

Did it surprise you to hear of an officer's giving such testimony?

DAY: It astonished me, because basically it was a breach of faith with those people he had served with. It was absolutely untrue that we were committing atrocities there. It was absolutely untrue that we were raping women and murdering children and doing all those kinds of things. And either he knew that was untrue, or he should have known just from his own experiences . . . Later, I found out that he had made these two visits to meet with Le Duc Tho in Paris, and push the enemy's seven-point piece plan--which amounted to us tendering some kind of ransom for the POWs, and under that condition we would come home, and then we would apologize for ever having been in the war. It told me that he really was a man of Benedict Arnold qualities, because that's what Benedict Arnold did. He fought for the country and then crossed over to the British…

Did it undermine your morale to hear that a fellow officer of the U.S. military was essentially parroting what your captors were telling you and torturing you to get you to say?

DAY: Yes. And I have to be straightforward. I did not know who this Naval officer was, and I didn't know exactly what it was he was supposed to be saying. I just heard this story that a Naval officer was basically saying the same stuff that Jane Fonda was saying. Now, of course, in 1972, she was over there posing on gun sights, as were several other anti-war people who wanted the Communists to win. And so to be frank with you, in my mind in jail at that time, I just suspected that it was some sort of hanger-on with Jane Fonda. I just assumed that it was some Naval officer that had kind of gone around the bend, and I certainly never connected it up with him specifically. I had no clue who John Kerry was. I was skeptical of that story, and I thought it might just be some more propaganda from the Vietnamese...

Had John Kerry's plan to unilaterally withdraw from Vietnam been put into effect, would your life, as a POW, have been in greater or less danger, and would there have been a greater or a lesser chance of your going home?

DAY: It would have been in far greater danger. They always called me a war criminal, they threatened several times to shoot me after the war. Frankly, I didn't go to sleep every night sick with worry because in my gut I knew that our government was going to bomb them out, and we were going to get out under different conditions. But had the surrender occurred, it would have been a totally different thing, because then those people would have been totally able to do anything they wanted to do with us. They could have turned us loose, they could have not turned us loose, they could have shot us, they could have put us on trial. They could have done anything they wanted to. And not only that, but there would have been a blood bath of the South Vietnamese that would have been in the hundreds of thousands, that would have died and been tortured. . . .

On "Meet the Press," Tim Russert brought up Kerry's 1971 testimony. Kerry said that some of the language he used might have been inappropriate, spoken as an angry young man. Does that cut it for you as an apology?

DAY: It wasn't even in the ballpark. It was no apology--it wasn't even an explanation. He dodged the question, is what happened. . . . He blackened every Vietnam veteran's name when he came back and told all of those terrible stories about what we were supposedly doing. And he is just one of the reasons that the myth exists about all of the crazy, nutty, dope-addicted, booze-addicted failures that came out of Vietnam because of that awful war. Col. Bui Tin of the North Vietnamese government said words to this effect: that every day, the North Vietnamese listened to the radio to see what was happening back here in the United States. And what they heard from Kerry was exactly the kind of propaganda that they wanted to hear, because their claim was they were going to win this war on the streets of San Francisco and New York City. And it was clear that John Kerry was helping them do that. That was also part of the Soviet Union's disinformation program, which was saying exactly the same thing that John Kerry was saying… He basically functioned as a propaganda minister for both the Russians and the North Vietnamese. He basically was advocating that the Communists win.

Have you ever been active in politics before?

DAY: Yes. I supported Harry Truman in 1948. I supported Ronald Reagan. I supported George Bush Senior. I supported John McCain [in 2000], and I went with John's campaign to New Hampshire and Virginia and all around the country quite a bit. I was his commander in jail.

Now even the single most highly decorated Veteran is speaking out against Kerry. What's next the pope, and then maybe God or Buddha? It seems everyone who is anyone with any amount of common sense want to see Waffles fail miserably.

Bush-Cheney '04
4 MORE YEARS

SlagleRock Out!





Posted by SlagleRock at October 16, 2004 12:52 PM
Comments

Great find, SlagleRock. Thanks a lot.

Posted by: patrickafir at October 16, 2004 03:33 PM

Yep, good info, maybe, but did you really have to post the link three times in a row on John of Argghhh's site?

Posted by: Justthisguy at October 16, 2004 03:56 PM

Thanks for commenting on my blog, and for the link. But this article doens't prove anything, or isn't even particularly convincing. For every one of these anti-Kerry veterans you can producer, I can produce ten, including a long list of retired generals (who are also decorated veterans themselves) that support Kerry, think his quite fit to be commander-in-chief, and have no problem with what he did after coming back from Vietnam. What does it say that John McCain, a POW himlself, is one of Kerry's best friends in the Senate? Would McCain befriend a Benedict Arnold? Beside, Kerry based his criticism on town hall meetings with many, many veterans around that time, Are all of them liars and traitors too?

What bothers those who criticize Kerry for his antiwar activities is that they never want to acknowledge that America is just as capable of acting immoraly as any other country. This fact is not to be swept under the rug, but confronted so it doesn't happen again. If you don't learn from the mistakes in your history, you're bound to repeat them.

Posted by: Editor, Another Liberal Blog at October 16, 2004 05:02 PM

Good post, it's too bad that more veterans don't step up to the plate, but most of us would rather forget what happened and how we were betrayed.

Posted by: Jack at October 16, 2004 05:30 PM

"If you don't learn from the mistakes in your history, you're bound to repeat them." - Editor, Another Liberal Blog

Mass.'s mistake was to elect Kerry as Senator. It'll be America's mistake to elect him as president. I too can only hope we learn from our mistakes.

Posted by: Josh at October 16, 2004 06:13 PM

"Beside, Kerry based his criticism on town hall meetings with many, many veterans around that time, Are all of them liars and traitors too?"

Are you joking? Does the name B.G. Burkett ring a bell? I'm too damned mad to remember the html for link, cut and paste this, dammit...

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/096670360X/qid=1097980121/sr=2-1/ref=pd_ka_b_2_1/002-0487258-3339231

Leftists must never be allowed to run the country.

Posted by: Neuroto at October 16, 2004 07:34 PM

Thanks for the comment to my post, Sir. Despite the misinformation posted by Editor, Another Liberal Blog, this is just one more round of ammo fired at John Kerry from those of us who have reason to know Kerry's work well.

The treatment we in uniform received due to Kerry, Cronkite and the rest of those who lied and slandered their way through the 70's was, at best, pathetic. May we stop Kerry and his ilk so that it never happens to anyone else with the balls to serve again.

Posted by: GOC in Winston Salem at October 16, 2004 10:24 PM

Yeah, JF'nK's so tight with McCain that McCain endorsed Bush for president.

Posted by: suboptimal at October 17, 2004 12:25 AM

Being collegial towards Al-Q'erry in the senate only speaks to the goodness of John McCain, who besides being an old crank, is a great man, without a doubt.
His endorsemnt of Bush, similarly, speaks to his capacity to forgive and forget the slings and arrows of politics when action is called for-- i.e. here in the post- 9/11 world.
Kerry blows...he not only has a lousy record in the senate, a record of being harmful to the interests of G.I.s, a record of degrading the capabilities of the Us's intel apparati, a tendency to equivocate, and a miserable ecord of attendance of senate intel committee meetings, but he also wants to break the Cheneys' balls for having a gay daughter.

Will they stop at nothing???

TNS

Posted by: TripleNeckSteel at October 17, 2004 03:19 AM

For every one of these anti-Kerry veterans you can producer, I can produce ten, including a long list of retired generals (who are also decorated veterans themselves) that support Kerry, think his quite fit to be commander-in-chief, and have no problem with what he did after coming back from Vietnam.

Start producing, buddy. I'll show you mine if you show me yours.
If the Communist News Network (www.drudgereport.com/flash5.htm) shows these poll figures, what do you think they'll look like after 'Stolen Honor' aires?

Posted by: Mikenchi at October 17, 2004 12:01 PM

Editor, Another Liberal Blog said:
...including a long list of retired generals.
If you don't include Wesley "Lets bomb 'em" Clark (retired, thank G_D) you won't have much of a list, either.

*I know its a double negative, let's see if the editor can figure it out.

Posted by: Mikenchi at October 17, 2004 12:09 PM

"...I can produce ten, including a long list of retired generals (who are also decorated veterans themselves) that support Kerry, think his quite fit to be commander-in-chief, and have no problem with what he did after coming back from Vietnam."

Okay "editor", name just 10 of these generals.

"Beside, Kerry based his criticism on town hall meetings with many, many veterans around that time, Are all of them liars and traitors too?"

Ummm. YES! B.Burkette was just the tip of the lying iceburg...It was later determined that many of these vets were later to be found to have never served in VN, and that indeed a nuber of them were NOT veterans at all!.

ALSO it is an UNDENIALABLE FACT that Kerry met with the enemy in time of war(Le DUC THO in Paris,1972), and that he was still an Officer in the ACTIVE NAVAL RESERVE at the time of these meetings, the ONLY question is why the H he wasnt't prosecuted for violations of not only the UCMJ, but the US constituion AND the US Civil Code, all three of which makes these activities illegal.

Really, "editor" I thought you media folks were taught a little thing called "Fact Check" in Journalism 101

Posted by: delftsman3 at October 17, 2004 12:14 PM

WHAT'S WITH THE 1978 VS 1972 DISCHARGE???
THE 180 FORM?

WHY CAN'T YOU VETS GET TO SEN WARNER (NOW CHAIRMAN
OF ARMED SERVICES COMM.)WHO WAS SEC OF NAVY TO
GET THIS CLEARED UP?

AND HOW ABOUT LEHMAN(MAY HAVE MISSPELLED) THE
911 COMISSION MEMBER WHO WAS SEC OF NAVY WHEN
THE @#@#!! HAD HIS CITATIONS REISSUED, AND UPDATED
TO HIS BENEFIT. UNDERSTAND LEHMAN HAS REQUESTED
INVESTIGATION AS HE STATES HE NEVER SIGNED OR
GAVE PERMISSION ON THESE. WHERE DOES THIS STAND?

WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE "WITH V" ON THE #@#$$!'S
CITATIONS?

WHY IS A 180 NEEDED TO RELEASE SOME OF THESE
RECORDS - WOULD NEED JAG OFFICER ANSWER- BUT
I WOULD THINK THAT ANY OFFICER THAT SIGNED OFF
ON DOCUMENTS COULD REQUEST A COPY OF THOSE DOCUMENTS. WE SHOULD THEREFORE BE ABLE TO GET
THE ORIGINAL REPORTS AND TRACE IT UP THE LADDER

HOW CAN WE HAVE A TRAITOR AH FOR COMMANDER IN
CHIEF???

ASK SEN WARNER

OH AND ISN'T IT GREAT THAT #@$$!! ONLY PAID 12%
IN INCOME TAXES

Posted by: WYNN at October 17, 2004 01:19 PM

How is it that GW paid nearly double in taxes what Waffles did? Waffles is worth infinitely more money than the President yet like most things he has weasled out of paying his due.

SlagleRock Out!

Posted by: SlagleRock at October 18, 2004 08:06 AM

Kerry and Edwards were wrong for American and even more wrong for Americans
Why then Dems think that ?Ultra liberals..even those who hide under guise of "progressive " as they now like to refer to themselves are just not good for what this Nation needs as a whole.

TErm limits for Sen and Congress and life apointments should expire at age 65

Posted by: John Holte at December 28, 2004 08:59 AM

Very good article

Posted by: Phendimetrazine at April 15, 2005 09:26 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?