Don't be a fool and die for your country. Let the other sonofabitch die for his.
-- General George S. Patton
March 09, 2006
Deputy Faces Charges in Airman's Shooting
Not that this decision surprises me at all...
SAN BERNARDINO, Calif. - A sheriff's deputy who was videotaped shooting an unarmed Iraq War veteran after a car chase will be charged with attempted voluntary manslaughter, authorities said Tuesday.The decision to charge Deputy Ivory J. Webb, 45, was announced by San Bernardino County District Attorney Michael A. Ramos.
Sheriff Gary Penrod said Webb will remain on paid administrative leave during the investigation into the shooting of Air Force Senior Airman Elio Carrion, 21.
"I respect the decision of the district attorney's office," Penrod said.
It is the first time the county's prosecutors have filed charges against a lawman for an on-duty shooting.
Webb's arraignment was set for Wednesday. If convicted, he could face up to 18 1/2 years in prison.
The charge includes the special allegations of infliction of great bodily injury and use of a firearm, Ramos said at a news conference. In California, such enhancements can result in extra prison time.
Carrion, an Air Force security officer just back from Iraq, was a passenger in a Corvette that police chased at high speed on the night of Jan. 29 until the Corvette crashed into a wall in Chino, about 45 miles east of Los Angeles.
A grainy videotape shot by a bystander showed Carrion on the ground next to the car with Webb standing and pointing at gun at him.
A voice appears to order Carrion to rise, but when the airman appears to begin complying, the deputy shoots him three times. Carrion was shot in the chest, shoulder and thigh and was hospitalized for several days.
Authorities found no weapons on Carrion or the driver, Luis Escobedo.
Prosecutors announced they were charging Escobedo with a felony of attempting to evade a peace officer while driving recklessly and misdemeanor driving under the influence. He was expected to surrender Wednesday. The maximum penalty if convicted would be 3 1/2 years in prison.
The FBI is investigating possible civil rights violations. The sheriff's department conducted its own probe and gave the results to the district attorney's office.
At the time, the sheriff said the videotape "arouses a lot of suspicion," but he pointed out that it is fuzzy and contains gaps.
"In any type of investigation it is the responsibility of the Sheriff's Department to put together all the facts," Penrod said Tuesday. "The district attorney's role is to take those facts and determine whether there is sufficient evidence to issue a criminal complaint. Obviously that was their choice in this investigation."
Ramos assigned two top attorneys to review the shooting and requested an FBI enhancement of the videotape.
I saw the video and posted about it a while back. It looked wrong to me from the start and now, it looks like the law might do right.
OK, everybody....
Sound off, what do you think?
lagleRock Out!
Given California's propensity to chase speeders then glorify the event on the television. It doesn't surprise me that something like this would happen. Once the speeder knows he can run with impunity the rest of the community will follow suit, this happens all the time. I'm not defending this officer but it doesn't take much to see that they get rightfully pissed off at the insolence of motorists thumbing their noses at their attempts to enforce the laws. I firmly believe that if you are going to break the law and run that the following police should stop your flight, with deadly force if need be. Instead of taking aerial photo's of the fleeing motorists, I'd like to see aerial apprehensions with zero tolerance, this would deter not only the speeder but future speeders. Light them up, missiles on the way!!!
Posted by: Jack at March 9, 2006 06:33 PMOk Jack. The thing you need to remember here is that this was a passenger not the driver. How come they did not shoot the driver? He was in fact the one driving the car. The shooting of any unarmed person lying on the ground is a little extreme. Not to mention shooting him three times. The use of force is authorized to end a chase. Once the chase has ended though and the suspect is complying with your orders is there still a right for deadly force? But maybe we should listen to you and give all the law enforcement Apache helicopters. Then they won't need cars at all.
Posted by: Blunt at March 10, 2006 08:44 AM